Aquinas leap-frogging Sadie Hawkins.



 Bn posits the query:  "What would Aquinas think of the modern theory of black holes?"


Several points spring to mind:


As a type and shadow ourselves, 

we have only a "type and shadow" level of realization;  

our awe is proof of God's absolute dominion.  

Our astonishment reveals in part the gulf between man and the perfect God, 

marking our own reasoning facility as insubstantial.

That wonder and the impetus to address it, 

our presumption to contend with nature with reason

Reveals of what perfection whence we came.


Our astonishment over the phenomena is perhaps a kind of prayer;

Which might highlight a justification for some to make the matter plain,

As if to dispel and disperse anything like prayer,

And reduce all of the heavens and earth to mere data points.

But there are those that would grasp at the truth of the heavens

For the sake of not reason, but perfect communion with God.


Insufficient research(wonder) is proof of God.

Setting one's eyes towards the heavens is wonder about God.

Conducting empirical research is as seminary, learning of God.

Complete understanding through science is proof of God.


To study nature

Is to contemplate God.

And contemplating God

Is presumption from we unworthies,

Those yet paradoxically loved by God

All the perfections and flaws

Allowed to contest and contend our measure of Creation.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

faith, teachings of the natural world, look here haters, a visage marred; nations sprinkled

A word in season, to him that is weary: via Isaiah.

The wheat and the chaff.